Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The game was never in doubt. SMU enjoyed a four possession lead from the first quarter until the final whistle. UNT and SMU are supposed to be at the same competitive level. They both have good coaches and have had top g5 recruiting classes in Texas.Sorry I meant 59-3 (after Texas took their foot off 2nd half). I would much rather play in a fairly competitive game then an absolute dud blowout. And yes I know they are P5.
I want UTEP to win 65-35. If we get blown out I will be ok too since it will be one week closer to Dimel's last game.The game was never in doubt. SMU enjoyed a four possession lead from the first quarter until the final whistle. UNT and SMU are supposed to be at the same competitive level. They both have good coaches and have had top g5 recruiting classes in Texas.
UTEP and ULM are in somewhat similar competitive levels. IMO they’re a level above us. We’re a bottom table and they compete for a mid table spot.
I guarantee you if we play ULM the same way UNT played SMU no one would call it a fairly competitive game. They would call it what it was, a blowout loss.
Dykes was available when we hired Dimel.I want UTEP to win 65-35. If we get blown out I will be ok too since it will be one week closer to Dimel's last game.
Dykes was available when we hired Dimel.
Texas or SFA, I expect UTEP coaches to have their team "bright eye'd and bushy tailed" and ready to go.The game was never in doubt. SMU enjoyed a four possession lead from the first quarter until the final whistle. UNT and SMU are supposed to be at the same competitive level. They both have good coaches and have had top g5 recruiting classes in Texas.
UTEP and ULM are in somewhat similar competitive levels. IMO they’re a level above us. We’re a bottom table and they compete for a mid table spot.
I guarantee you if we play ULM the same way UNT played SMU no one would call it a fairly competitive game. They would call it what it was, a blowout loss.
If UTEP can just get through Saturday's game, then I feel that our Athletic Department will have done as well as possible for the non-conference this season, given all of the circumstances. We picked up our large pay check from UT, we picked up a return home game from ULM to be scheduled in a non-covid year, and of course we were also able to add 2(maybe even 3) much needed wins in as well.
I do have a feeling that UTEP is due to have some type of COVID issue(possibly even after this ULM/La. Tech back to back road swing), but at least at that point it would only be a conference game jeopardized(which is easier to reschedule and also doesn't have the same financial maneuvering as a non-conference contract).
The other question is that the Big Ten, MWC, and PAC 12 are all potentially planning on coming back and playing 8 games in 8 straight weeks. That doesn't leave any room for error and given the number of randomly cancelled games, one would think that some of those schools might only get in 6 or 7 games this season(if 1 or 2 get canceled). As a UTEP fan and a program that needs experience to get better, I am glad that we might get the chance to potentially have anywhere between 60% to 100% more games that some other schools will get out of this season.
If we can’t get bowl eligible now...that ancient burial site theory is legit!
Is Tio Bernie considering opening up the Sun Bowl again?
That's true but it also means that if the NM Bowl wants a 4-6 UTEP over a 5-5 UTSA they can do that. ESPN bowls will be played due to the need for tv inventory so if UTEP can win 5 or more there is a good chance for the Miners to go bowling since CUSA has 6 or 7 ties to bowls.All this means is that a 2-6 Kansas team will go bowling over a 5-5 UTEP team
Hey NoWins, your diaper is full. Go change it.All this means is that a 2-6 Kansas team will go bowling over a 5-5 UTEP team
As of now there are about 80 bowl slots w ith only 75 teams playing. Other conferences are planning to start playing in late Oct but no guarantee they will get things going.
Only one has canceled so far. Hope is still alive.No guarantee the bowls will be played either.
Actually the current top 2 in the bottom 10 are ULM and UTEP. So I guess this is our bowl game, just a little early.So in reality, you could actually have the toilet bowl this year. The 2 worst football teams playing each other, or the top 2 in the ESPN bottom 10.
I hope to God that UTEP wins more games, but it is entirely possible that they may not. I can see Senter right now bragging how his hire Dimel guided UTEP to a bowl game.
That extra guaranteed win will go a lot further than a guaranteed loss would have.That's true but it also means that if the NM Bowl wants a 4-6 UTEP over a 5-5 UTSA they can do that. ESPN bowls will be played due to the need for tv inventory so if UTEP can win 5 or more there is a good chance for the Miners to go bowling since CUSA has 6 or 7 ties to bowls.
That extra guaranteed win will go a lot further than a guaranteed loss would have.