ADVERTISEMENT

Billy return game thread - 12/16

True to some extent, but once you pass a certain amount of losses, it’s all for nothing.

I don’t have a problem with UTEP’s schedule this year, from a non-STH POV. A lot of road games. Crap home games though. Wish they would schedule 1 or 2 more Power teams instead of non-D1 teams.
True. Damned if you do, damned if you don't. At least you give yourself more of a chance if one of those miracle seasons were to occur and you've walked murderer's row.

Transfer Portal

I agree...for the most part. I think what you said applies to fb and bb players, and a fortunate gymnast, however most college sports, the non-revenue sports, have largely remained college like.
I think one of the largest NIL deals went to a volleyball players. They were like 2nd. Oops she is in gymnastics and she ranks 4 th. I never heard of her.


  • Like
Reactions: kickballpro

Transfer Portal

I agree for the most part. Yes, their scholarship is a tremendous benefit that most of college students do not receive, but most of the football/basketball athletes choose not to really use this benefit.

I think they should be paid, and only because they’re bringing in significant revenue to their school. I do have an issue with the amount most of them are being paid. I think all players on the team should be equal and the amounts should be determined by the conference. Obviously an SEC player would “make” more than one in CUSA.

I would rather the athletes get something similar to a pension after they’re done playing. While long term or great players (Tom Brady, Adrian Peterson, Shaq, Jordan, Tim Hardaway) would forfeit their earnings so it can be given to “less fortunate” athletes.
I agree with both of of the bold statements. What I said from the beginning. Look at the mess now!!

Transfer Portal

Before you know it high school players are gonna want to get paid.

How about the little Leaguers?? How much does ESPN make from the Little League World Series??
Hell has frozen over! I actually agree with Fili for once. Little leaguers are being exploited by The Mouse Network. Time for moms and dads to unite and demand they get paid.

Billy return game thread - 12/16

But there’s a lesson to learn from it. If you want to manipulate the NET system, stop scheduling shitty teams at home and hit the road at Power teams.
True to some extent, but once you pass a certain amount of losses, it’s all for nothing.

I don’t have a problem with UTEP’s schedule this year, from a non-STH POV. A lot of road games. Crap home games though. Wish they would schedule 1 or 2 more Power teams instead of non-D1 teams.
  • Like
Reactions: MinerManiac

Transfer Portal

I know that I'm probably in the minority here, but I am of the opinion that college athletes have always been "paid." I personally consider a full ride scholarship, with tuition, fees, books, room, and board completely covered, to be rather significant payment, especially given the fact that for some schools this benefit can reach well into six figures.

I do get the original spirit of the NIL: that if some car dealership, restaurant, video game company, etc. wants to use a collegiate athlete to advertise their business, the business should be allowed to, and the athlete should be compensated for it. But the NIL has opened up a huge can of worms that, like Dementia Joe, I worry is going to lead to several of the mid majors not having the resources to compete. If that happens they will have no choice but to drop athletics, which will cut the access to college for countless athletes. That, to me, would be a tragedy.
I agree for the most part. Yes, their scholarship is a tremendous benefit that most of college students do not receive, but most of the football/basketball athletes choose not to really use this benefit.

I think they should be paid, and only because they’re bringing in significant revenue to their school. I do have an issue with the amount most of them are being paid. I think all players on the team should be equal and the amounts should be determined by the conference. Obviously an SEC player would “make” more than one in CUSA.

I would rather the athletes get something similar to a pension after they’re done playing. While long term or great players (Tom Brady, Adrian Peterson, Shaq, Jordan, Tim Hardaway) would forfeit their earnings so it can be given to “less fortunate” athletes.

Transfer Portal

I know that I'm probably in the minority here, but I am of the opinion that college athletes have always been "paid." I personally consider a full ride scholarship, with tuition, fees, books, room, and board completely covered, to be rather significant payment, especially given the fact that for some schools this benefit can reach well into six figures.

I do get the original spirit of the NIL: that if some car dealership, restaurant, video game company, etc. wants to use a collegiate athlete to advertise their business, the business should be allowed to, and the athlete should be compensated for it. But the NIL has opened up a huge can of worms that, like Dementia Joe, I worry is going to lead to several of the mid majors not having the resources to compete. If that happens they will have no choice but to drop athletics, which will cut the access to college for countless athletes. That, to me, would be a tragedy.

Transfer Portal

To be fair though, it wasn’t until the 90s when college sports were big time. I think what’s going on now is outrageous. There needs to be a middle ground or else this model is unsustainable. Eventually fans will stop caring and watching. Then everything resets.

I disagree. Fans will never stop watching. Case in point: Dallas Cowboys

Transfer Portal

To be fair though, it wasn’t until the 90s when college sports were big time. I think what’s going on now is outrageous. There needs to be a middle ground or else this model is unsustainable. Eventually fans will stop caring and watching. Then everything resets.
The one percenters of athletes have ruined college athletics for the other 99% who will never turn pro, other than in the professions earned by their college degrees. Are the athletes themselves to blame, or shady agents and influencers who are in the ears of these athletes? The day will come when colleges who can’t afford to pay athletes will dissolve their athletic programs. Who benefits then? The elite and rich colleges will continue on of course. But now the other 99% won’t have opportunities for a scholarship and free ride towards a degree. Who wins at the end? The current system is broken and is only getting worse.

Transfer Portal

For decades, the NCAA has profited from the hard work and talent of student athletes, generating billions in revenue while restricting athletes from earning anything for themselves. Now that these athletes are finally pushing back some are expressing outrage. However, this shift is long overdue, a step toward fairness in a system that has disproportionately benefited institutions while limiting the opportunities of the very individuals who make it all possible.
To be fair though, it wasn’t until the 90s when college sports were big time. I think what’s going on now is outrageous. There needs to be a middle ground or else this model is unsustainable. Eventually fans will stop caring and watching. Then everything resets.
ADVERTISEMENT

Filter

ADVERTISEMENT