Miners v Aggies Game Thread
- Thread starter MinerManiac
- Start date
We would have had the ball on offense, but thanks to the stupid unnecessary roughness penalty it's now 7-0 Aggies.
And in the end it cost them a touchdown.
Not only do the Miners have too many penalties, but they also always come at the worst possible time. There was a very similar drive-extending penalty against UNLV that resulted in a touchdown instead of a chance to tie.
If our offense doesn’t respond on this drive, oh boy
dimel obviously feeling guilty for throwing the ball and scoring points against fiu
Dimel can't be happy. Not that we're losing, he doesn't care about that. But so far NMSU is winning TOP.
You can tell these two offenses are night and day. I swear Dimel thinks he can win a Formula 1 race with a Model T.
Good football coaches show different looks on offense instead of Dismel’s predictable and boring offense.
Okay, one of you smart people explain something to me.
At the end of the quarter, the ref just stood behind the snapper to prevent the Miners from running a play to allow NMSU to "make substitutions."
Earlier in the quarter, NMSU ran a play REALLY REALLY fast, as in the camera didn't even have time to move back to the play before the ball was snapped, and the Miners were called for "12 men on the field" because they didn't have time to make a substitution.
Why wasn't the ref standing behind NMSU's snapper to prevent NMSU from snapping the ball so that UTEP could have enough time to make a substitution?
At the end of the quarter, the ref just stood behind the snapper to prevent the Miners from running a play to allow NMSU to "make substitutions."
Earlier in the quarter, NMSU ran a play REALLY REALLY fast, as in the camera didn't even have time to move back to the play before the ball was snapped, and the Miners were called for "12 men on the field" because they didn't have time to make a substitution.
Why wasn't the ref standing behind NMSU's snapper to prevent NMSU from snapping the ball so that UTEP could have enough time to make a substitution?
I'm going to assume it's similar to the NFL. Utep must have made a substitution, which allows NMSU to then counter.
You only get the opportunity to match up on defense if the offense makes a sub. If the offense doesn't sub, the ref doesn't stop the snap.
I believe since the Miners made a substitution, that allows the Aggies to substitute.
You have to allow D subs when offense subs players. The stupid ref allowed more NMSU subs as compared to UTEP’s offensive subs. The UTEP 12 men was a UTEP player jogging off instead of running off to avoid penalty.
That’s total bs. These refs appear to be favoring the aggies.
Holy crap nmsu has a fat cheerleader. Too much Vitamin T for her.
Nice run by Hankins.
Nice run by Hankins.
Nice run by Hankins! Almost got the TD. Who said he was slow?
Touchdown Miners!!! Great run to set it up by Hankins.
I think it's essentially a judgment call. As long as they think is needed for the defense to make their substitution.
UTEP almost gave up the 3rd and 21.
Sad to say, but if the timeout gets them a stop, it's probably a good outcome for a Dimel team.
This is Dimel ball. Management reacts when the fire starts.
Similar threads
