Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
I'm thrilled with the amazing comeback effort. How could anyone dream of being down 19 points, with the way things were going and come back to win this very special meaningful game.I had them dead in the water with about 7 min to go but man that last 7 min and OT was inteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeense!
I had them dead in the water with about 7 min to go but man that last 7 min and OT was inteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeense!
I had them dead in the water with about 7 min to go but man that last 7 min and OT was inteeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeense!
I know this team stands no chance against most teams due to their lack of height/rebounding. They're also prone to playing sloppy basketball and taking poor shots. But I will not question their heart and hustle. That alone should make us proud.
I would agree. This team can be frustratingly bad. But they can be scintillatingly good. That was a heck of a performance and a fun, fun game to be a part of.I was fortunate enough to be in attendance; it was one of the most valiant comebacks I've ever witnessed.
FIRE Floyd !!!And someone will say fire Floyd in ......3 .....2 .....1
Yours must be a really gray world. Can't help but wonder if you'd be willing to have your boss use the same rationale when deciding whether or not you should be fired or retained? But that's probably not a "fair" comparison.So UTEP beats 2 teams at home, coming back from huge deficits, that are .500 at best and everyone is saying this should save Floyd's job? Yes, we should be happy the team won, but isn't that what you are supposed to do against these teams at home?
The bottom line is what UTEP does from this point on. If we still can't win on the road, do these 2 wins save his job? Is this what everyone points to at the end of the season.
Maybe the ones that think they want Floyd back now after these HUGE wins, should say to themselves: If these wins were so big, maybe it is a bigger reason for Floyd to be gone since he does have the talent to win, but is still not winning. That would be a straight up coaching problem.
Now if you think they do not have the talent to win, but are such overachievers, then again, Floyd has had over 5 years to recruit, and develop talent and it has not appeared the way everyone has hoped. Again, reason to make a change or else this is the same thing we get over and over again. These are the players Floyd signed (and the ones that didn't come are also his fault), and you have to do the best you can with what you have. Whatever the talent level. Can we really say this team has done the best they could?
Now lastly, maybe this is the spark they needed and we run off a bunch of wins and take the tournament. That would be simply incredible and that is what really would make me excited. Not 2 wins at home against teams that we SHOULD beat.
"Everyone is saying this should save Floyd's job" - I'm reading the same board, I mostly have been reading joy for the comeback win and appreciation for not giving up and the effort. My position hasn't changed on the success of the season or Floyd's tenure here because of the last two games. I do hope, as others have shared that this team continues with this aggressive style of play.So UTEP beats 2 teams at home, coming back from huge deficits, that are .500 at best and everyone is saying this should save Floyd's job? Yes, we should be happy the team won, but isn't that what you are supposed to do against these teams at home?
The bottom line is what UTEP does from this point on. If we still can't win on the road, do these 2 wins save his job? Is this what everyone points to at the end of the season.
Maybe the ones that think they want Floyd back now after these HUGE wins, should say to themselves: If these wins were so big, maybe it is a bigger reason for Floyd to be gone since he does have the talent to win, but is still not winning. That would be a straight up coaching problem.
Now if you think they do not have the talent to win, but are such overachievers, then again, Floyd has had over 5 years to recruit, and develop talent and it has not appeared the way everyone has hoped. Again, reason to make a change or else this is the same thing we get over and over again. These are the players Floyd signed (and the ones that didn't come are also his fault), and you have to do the best you can with what you have. Whatever the talent level. Can we really say this team has done the best they could?
Now lastly, maybe this is the spark they needed and we run off a bunch of wins and take the tournament. That would be simply incredible and that is what really would make me excited. Not 2 wins at home against teams that we SHOULD beat.
Yours must be a really gray world. Can't help but wonder if you'd be willing to have your boss use the same rationale when deciding whether or not you should be fired or retained? But that's probably not a "fair" comparison.
I would be happy that a boss would use that rationale. If I don't do my job for weeks, or a crappy one at that, then one week I decide to do my job and do it well, should my boss use that one week when he decides to keep me or give me a raise? Or should he judge me on my body of work?
Your analogy is flawed. How many jobs make wins and losses so brutally clear? What's your job?
Every single job has metrics that are measurable. Doesn't matter what you do. Sales, planning, manufacturing.....whomever you are evaluated by determines if you have met those measurements or not. Nobody on this board will make that determination. But people are free to have opinions.
Fair enough. But within the profession of coaching they are all measured by the same thing. And they all know exactly how it works.I spent 25 years in sales -- "you are your number." The difference is there was no limit on the number of pitches I could make, and if I hustled and lost more deals than I won, but still made my number, everyone was happy. In coaching, one team wins and one loses, and the number of games is fixed. I believe it's different than most jobs.
And Unihorn, what happens if you did not make your number? The company suffers, because you are not being productive enough. Do you really think they would have kept you without SUCCESSFULLY making that number? I am sure many were let go because they could not achieve their number.
I have seen good artist get burnt out trying to meet the quotas set by Gallerys and Agents. I got tired of Ladies coming into my Gallery, many years ago, and state, "oh, I love it, but could you paint it in a mauve pallet to match my livingroom decor!"Even an artist has metrics for and indicating success in their field: commissioned works, gallery showings, notoriety - it's all relative.
Yes it is all relative, I have had only one of the "metrics" you mention, 1-3 by your measure makes me quite a failure and I never really thought of myself or my work as such. The human spirit and the ability to contribute to anything can't always be quantified or measured like art, or coaching a basketball team. It would be silly to dismiss the Pope because he failed to save the requisite souls this year or missed his quota of papal visits. To me coaching is a little bit like that and win and loses certainly are a factor, going to the NCAA is as well, but in Floyds favor I think his loyalty to UTEP and the miner community is worth something. I think he has worked hard to bring us back to the glory years, but this may take way more than we realize. We all want to hold him to that great past metric that UTEP once had only problem is our situation and college basketball has changed and it is not the same challenge it was for Barbee or Sadler et al. You may want Floyd gone because he hasn't got us to the big dance, that's your metric, others may have a different one and I am just as disappointed with his performance as you are. We all profess the bottom line stuff and that success is only measured in wins and losses, but I don't think the world should work that way, to cold and uncaring for my liking. Art would fail to exist if every artist was guided by and worked only to be commissioned, show in a gallery or become famous.