UTEP1966, While I realize you are a troll when it comes to UTEP athletics, your posts on here are very good about politics.
Too bad "some" people can't see the forest for the trees.
OT: Ominous Vibe
- Thread starter JCorona
- Start date
Too bad "some" people can't see the forest for the trees.
Twenty-Three Nobel Economists Sign Letter Saying Harris Agenda Vastly Better For U.S. Economy
"While each of us has different views on the particulars of various economic policies, we believe that, overall, Harris’s economic agenda will improve our nation’s health, investment, sustainability, resilience, employment opportunities, and fairness and be vastly superior to the counterproductive economic agenda of Donald Trump."
The link above is to a PDF so if you're untrusting of that just google for it. Just came out a couple of hours ago.
"While each of us has different views on the particulars of various economic policies, we believe that, overall, Harris’s economic agenda will improve our nation’s health, investment, sustainability, resilience, employment opportunities, and fairness and be vastly superior to the counterproductive economic agenda of Donald Trump."
The link above is to a PDF so if you're untrusting of that just google for it. Just came out a couple of hours ago.
Fan 1966, te haces pendejo o eres pendejo? Hard to tell with you hard-core Trumpians.
Is that like the letter those 50-something spooks signed claiming that Hunter's laptop is Russian disinformation?
Between her cackling and word salads, does she have anything productive to say? That’s why she has her “handlers” just like Senile Joe.
Well, I'm not familiar with the "50-something spooks" letter but who gives a crap about Hunter or his laptop? He never ran for office. If he broke the law then indict him, try him, and sentence him if found guilty. Otherwise, none of our business from a political standpoint.
That said, YES, Putin is working to get his cock-holster elected again because the orange ass-clown is easy to manipulate. The orange ass-clown bows before Putin and follows Putin's orders.
Of course you would say that. You blissfully overlook anything less than flattering about your side. But Biden himself referenced that letter during his debate with Trump in 2016:
Just as you are unconcerned about Biden family members running an influence-peddling operation with Joe Biden's name to extract millions of dollars from foreign actors. No conflict of interest there. Of course you wouldn't see a problem with that.
Democrats care SO MUCH about Russia now. I remember when "the '80s called and want their foreign policy back":
I'm sure you loved the Soviets under Reagan.
What I've read is the number 5 million thrown around about Hunter. Have you forgotten about the 640 million that Ivanka and Jared made while actually working in the White House? Hunter never worked in the White House so I don't give a crap about how much money he made selling art or cocaine or whatever he was selling. Ivanka and Jared make 640 million selling access to the orange fuhrer -- likely other congress people -- and another 2 billion -- with a B -- afterwards for their easy access while in the White House. I have to think you have blissfully overlooked that.
Oh, are you blissfully overlooking Trump's rape of a woman? Or any of his other crimes? I have to assume you are since you are still supporting and seemingly defending him.
I'm not a troll. Far from it. Why do you think I'm a troll? Any posts where I'm trolling?
50-something spooks lied and signed a letter implying that Hunter's laptop was Russian disinformation. Joe Biden then went into his debate with Trump and announced to the world that the spooks said Hunter's laptop was a "Russian plant." I'm just telling you why I'm skeptical of letters signed by "experts" in the run-up to the election.
There was no one my ballot with a last name of "Biden" running for President. I didn't give a crap about anyone named "Biden" when I cast my vote for Kamala Harris for President this past Monday. There was, however, an orange racist, bully, insurrectionist, conman, rapist with a last name of "Trump" on my ballot. I did not vote for him.
So you're fine with the coup against Biden? I would never for Biden and I think he's a terrible President, but even I felt sorry for him.
So wait, where is the "proof" about Ivanka and Jared? You're ok with Hunter and Joe meeting with foreign countries to benifit hunter?
Are YOU over looking joe showering with his daughter? Being incapacitated while in the white house? Not acknowledging his granddaughter? Hiding cocaine? Being to old and forgetful about stealing documents?
Shall we continue?
Wait, didn't you say you do a ton of due diligence about politicians? And you don't know about Vanky and her boy toy? Not surprised.
Nope, try again.
Asked on its verdict sheet whether Carroll, 79, had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll,” the nine-person jury checked the box that said “no.”
Trump found liable for sexually abusing and defaming E. Jean Carroll in civil trial and is ordered to pay $5 million
Carroll sued the former president, accusing him of battery over an alleged rape in the 1990s and of defamation for calling her account a "hoax."
www.google.com
No. YOU stop lying.
Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll
I will add that if I ask my mother, sister, wife, or daughter which word they would use to describe a man forcibly penetrating her vagina they would all say "rape." Which word would your female family members use?
Where is your proof?
I already showed you the proof. Either you're a troll or a dumbass.
"Asked on its verdict sheet whether Carroll, 79, had proven “by a preponderance of the evidence” that “Mr. Trump raped Ms. Carroll,” the nine-person jury checked the box that said “no.”
Trump was NEVER convicted of rape.
Trump was never convicted of rape, so I'm not sure where you're going with this.
Since you're a crazy liberal, then you first have to determine "what is a woman?" LOL
I gave it to you. You choose to disbelieve it. I hope none of your female family members ever experience a man forcibly penetrating her vagina. I'd hate to be you in that situation trying to defend that man.
Where is your proof? Link? I can't disbelieve anything because you never provided a direct link showing what you stated is true.
Again, Trump was NEVER convicted of rape.
What about my male family members or the males you endorse going into female locker rooms. I could go on and on?
I get it. You hate Trump. I showed you the facts and you continue to lie over and over again.
Yes. From May 9th, 2023, before the judge clarified on July 19th, 2023, as shown in the link I provided to you.
You might want to learn to read and mouse-over text. I provided you this link:
Loading…
www.washingtonpost.com
Click on this --> Judge clarifies: Yes, Trump was found to have raped E. Jean Carroll <-- THIS IS A LINK
I provided this to you in post #2583 a few posts above.
A jury did not convict Trump of rape. Try again.
"The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law"
I'd still hate to be you trying to explain to a female famly member how a man forcibly penetrating her vagina was not "rape."
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
So, if according to you Trump was convicted of rape, then why isn't he in jail?
Whom did you vote for in 2020, when the spooks put out that letter?
Civil judgement, not a criminal conviction. He's right and you're wrong. But this was already explained to you in the past:
https://utep.forums.rivals.com/threads/ot-ominous-vibe.11341/post-252545
like the other lies in your signature that you refuse to amend, so you're doing this on purpose.
I get it, man. You're cool with men raping women. Whatever floats your boat. I'm NOT cool with it.
“The finding that Ms. Carroll failed to prove that she was ‘raped’ within the meaning of the New York Penal Law does not mean that she failed to prove that Mr. Trump ‘raped’ her as many people commonly understand the word ‘rape,’ ” Kaplan wrote.
He added: “Indeed, as the evidence at trial recounted below makes clear, the jury found that Mr. Trump in fact did exactly that.”
Then why isn't Trump in jail if, according to you, he was convicted of rape?
Similar threads
