The chancellors of P5 make the rules for (revenue generating) sports.I agree. Note, the one time transfer exception was already in place for most non-revenue sports, so this is not newly written NCAA regulation. The NCAA, who we know picks and chooses how and who they impose regulations on, should be consistent across all types of sports in my opinion. Then again, the entire concept of the NCAA is a conflict of interest in terms of revenue generation and legitimate regulation.
https://www.cbssports.com/college-f...new-division-i-model-giving-power-5-autonomy/
NCAA adopts new Division I model giving Power 5 autonomy
As expected Thursday, the NCAA Division I Board of Directors passed a new model giving the five major conferences authority to create some of their own legislation and voting rights for athletes.
By a 16-2 vote, the NCAA adopted the Division I model released to its members last month. Division I board chairman Nathan Hatch, president at Wake Forest, said the vote “marks a significant step into a brighter future for Division I athletics.”
What does all of this mean? Some questions and (attempted) answers:
Q: What does “autonomy” mean for the Power 5 conferences and why is it happening?
It lets the SEC, ACC, Big Ten, Pac-12 and Big 12 create their own rules — other conferences can adopt them, too, if they want — in certain areas to benefit college athletes. Leaders of the major conferences say they have the resources to provide more to athletes and have tried for years but get blocked by smaller schools. External pressure by lawsuits and Congress has also forced the issue.