My pick is SMU.
SMU don't deserve to be in a power conference. They have no history of winning , all they have is money.
SMU don't deserve to be in a power conference. They have no history of winning , all they have is money.
That’s the only real correct answer and even then, once you understand that San Antonio is more desirable than El Paso, it’s not egregious. We’re only talking about the AAC too, which is mostly old CUSA members anyway.Derpity derp derp, meep meep.
You're probably to young to remember The Pony Express...the best players money could buy and they cleaned house with Dickerson and Craig.My pick is SMU.
SMU don't deserve to be in a power conference. They have no history of winning , all they have is money.
I know but still SMU just bought their way to a power conference.You're probably to young to remember The Pony Express...the best players money could buy and they cleaned house with Dickerson and Craig.
GO MINERS!
“No thanks” only because the money doesn’t work in their favor and the “Pac12” doesn’t include USC, Arizona, Oregon and any of the good schools.Definitely UTSA. They went from having to field a football team with walk-ons and Larry Coker to telling the PAC 12 no thanks we are good in the AAC.
Yeah, well UTSA doesn't have our traditional! (It's a joke Kane).“No thanks” only because the money doesn’t work in their favor and the “Pac12” doesn’t include USC, Arizona, Oregon and any of the good schools.
Damn, I remember those years well. We traded off with NMSU from year to year as the worst fb program in the nation. Talk about tradition!!Yeah, well UTSA doesn't have our traditional! (It's a joke Kane).