But they play in the Tournament lose or win. They getting to dance. While UTEP didnt even play in CUSA tourney.Being the best basketball team in the WAC is like being the best country singer in Egypt.
But they play in the Tournament lose or win. They getting to dance. While UTEP didnt even play in CUSA tourney.Being the best basketball team in the WAC is like being the best country singer in Egypt.
But they play in the Tournament lose or win. They getting to dance. While UTEP didnt even play in CUSA tourney.
Being the best basketball team in the WAC is like being the best country singer in Egypt.
Keep beating powerhouses like Chicago State and UMKC.
Hope you find a football conference soon!
NMSU's football situation is one thing, but the argument against their basketball success is weak.
Sure, the WAC is a trash conference, but the Aggies have swept us I don't know how many years and counting. So we can't even assume UTEP would have won a few WAC titles lately if we were in that conference.
We'd have probably been third or worse the last few years to NMSU, Grand Canyon and other similar world beaters.
I think the fundamentals say C-USA should be better, however, many of the C-USA schools are mismanaged and under-perform. UTEP perhaps being the biggest offender.The WAC is no worse than CUSA. Last year they ranked higher in RPI. This year cusa was a little better. There is no tangible difference in the two leagues.
NMSU's football situation is one thing, but the argument against their basketball success is weak.
Sure, the WAC is a trash conference, but the Aggies have swept us I don't know how many years and counting. So we can't even assume UTEP would have won a few WAC titles lately if we were in that conference.
We'd have probably been third or worse the last few years to NMSU, Grand Canyon and other similar world beaters.
I think that CUSA has five or six teams every year that are good, but then the bottom five or six teams are always horrid and drag down everyone's RPI (or actually the NCAA uses the NET now instead). There is so little parity in CUSA top to bottom that it's ridiculous. Given the situation, I think it's smart the way the conference groups teams into tiered play for the end of the season, to help prevent the top teams from taking a hit in their NET by playing the bad teams.The WAC is no worse than CUSA. Last year they ranked higher in RPI. This year cusa was a little better. There is no tangible difference in the two leagues.
They basically have a mwc schedule this year. That makes their scheduling easier and more interesting but financially probably doesn't do much for them.Those pay for the womens programs what basketball and football lack in revenue.
I agree with life, it's not sustainable and FCS looks realistic as another year passes.
They're going to get crushed in some of these games.They basically have a mwc schedule this year. That makes their scheduling easier and more interesting but financially probably doesn't do much for them.