I swear it feels like almost everyone in CUSA has hired a new coach after hitting some rock bottom lows. I’d like to see in what direction they were heading early in the process.
La Tech, Marshall, ODU, and MTSU have not made any recent head coaching changes.
UTSA 1-11 (before the hire)
12-11 (after two years)
Bowl appearance
USM 0-12
4-20
(bowl champions in third year)
FAU 3-9
16-10
CUSA champions
Bowl champions
FIU 4-8
17-9
Bowl champions
2 bowl appearances
UNT 1-11
14-13
2 bowl appearances
CUSA championship appearance
UAB 2-10
14-11
Bowl appearance
WKU lost a HC due to good success.
Charlotte 5-7
2-2
UTEP 0-12
2-13
RICE 1-11
1-14 but showing improvement in all the losses this year.
Basically every struggling program in our conference that hired a coach showed improvement by year two. Why is it that we’re the only school in the nation with so many excuses?
La Tech, Marshall, ODU, and MTSU have not made any recent head coaching changes.
UTSA 1-11 (before the hire)
12-11 (after two years)
Bowl appearance
USM 0-12
4-20
(bowl champions in third year)
FAU 3-9
16-10
CUSA champions
Bowl champions
FIU 4-8
17-9
Bowl champions
2 bowl appearances
UNT 1-11
14-13
2 bowl appearances
CUSA championship appearance
UAB 2-10
14-11
Bowl appearance
WKU lost a HC due to good success.
Charlotte 5-7
2-2
UTEP 0-12
2-13
RICE 1-11
1-14 but showing improvement in all the losses this year.
Basically every struggling program in our conference that hired a coach showed improvement by year two. Why is it that we’re the only school in the nation with so many excuses?