ADVERTISEMENT

New MWC Possibility:

Would this be better for UTEP?

  • Yes

    Votes: 37 92.5%
  • No

    Votes: 3 7.5%

  • Total voters
    40
Ok so now are we complaining that we may be leaving to the MWC? I’d rather play these teams than who we play now. Of course I’d prefer to just win period!
I’ve got no problem at all. I know UTEP doesn’t travel well BUT Albuquerque, and Las Vegas are short trips. Costs aside, no one’s going to complain about traveling to Hawaii.
 
I’m glad if true that we are going to the mwc —- but I was hoping for that pac 12 invite … I fear in a couple of years the mwc will just be conf USA 2.0
We could be losing out on a Pac invite, but a lot would have to happen for that to happen. UTEP is making the right choice here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: kickballpro
Which 2026 Schedule is better

MWC- 13 Games

@Oklahoma
Texas Southern
@Michigan
NMSU
@Air Force
UNM
UNLV
@ Hawaii
@San Jose State
Texas State
Austin Peay
@ Wyoming
Nevada

CUSA-12 games

@Oklahoma
Texas Southern
@Michigan
@San Jose State
NMSU
@Delaware
@ Sam Houston
Missouri State
Kennesaw State
@ Louisiana Tech
@ Liberty
Western Kentucky
 
You don’t really believe that do you? I don’t think people in that area are just going to start watching Wyoming vs San Jose games now.

They serve a purpose of getting a central time zone team for tv lineups. An 8pm ET game can be slotted into network programming now, without effecting the local team too much. Will fans actually watch? Different story.

It's not about Texas State. UTEP has lots of alumni and other fans (somehow!) in San Antonio and Austin that would put butts in seats and eyeballs on TV to watch our Miners.
 
Which 2026 Schedule is better

MWC- 13 Games

@Oklahoma
Texas Southern
@Michigan
NMSU
@Air Force
UNM
UNLV
@ Hawaii
@San Jose State
Texas State
Austin Peay
@ Wyoming
Nevada

CUSA-12 games

@Oklahoma
Texas Southern
@Michigan
@San Jose State
NMSU
@Delaware
@ Sam Houston
Missouri State
Kennesaw State
@ Louisiana Tech
@ Liberty
Western Kentucky
I said in another post, that the quality of football teams is probably about equal. Just from a logical and historical perspective, the MWC schedule is nicer. Especially since UTEP has been tagging along in CUSA for the last 10 years, while everyone else left.
 
It's not about Texas State. UTEP has lots of alumni and other fans (somehow!) in San Antonio and Austin that would put butts in seats and eyeballs on TV to watch our Miners.
Sure, but that won’t do anything nationally. If more UTEP fans attend those games in San Marcos, that only benefits Texas St’s pocket book.
 
  • Like
Reactions: FarWestTexas
I’ve got no problem at all. I know UTEP doesn’t travel well BUT Albuquerque, and Las Vegas are short trips. Costs aside, no one’s going to complain about traveling to Hawaii.
Even flying on southwest (WN) or American (AA) or united out of ELP
Air Force academy, WN has flights to Denver along with united (connect via AA)
Reno WN/AA connect in Dallas or Houston/Denver (united)
LAS WN direct (or allegiant/frontier, but it's not daily from what i remember)
ABQ drive
San Jose connect on WN/AA in PHX or LAS
Hawaii, just a red eye back to DFW/IAH and/or connect via WN in LAS/PHX
 
FWIW, I spent some time on the UNLV board tonight and their fans are warm to us joining the MWC. Not excited, but receptive. And I agree with one suggestion I read on their board that the MWC go all-in -- generally speaking -- in Texas and bring in UTEP, Texas State, and Sam Houston and really box out the PAC12. I kinda like that idea.
 
Which 2026 Schedule is better

MWC- 13 Games

@Oklahoma
Texas Southern
@Michigan
NMSU
@Air Force
UNM
UNLV
@ Hawaii
@San Jose State
Texas State
Austin Peay
@ Wyoming
Nevada

CUSA-12 games

@Oklahoma
Texas Southern
@Michigan
@San Jose State
NMSU
@Delaware
@ Sam Houston
Missouri State
Kennesaw State
@ Louisiana Tech
@ Liberty
Western Kentucky
Be honest, the La Tech rivalry was good for UTEP. WKU strengthened UTEP's schedule almost every year as did Liberty and MTSU basketball games were good many years.

However, those MW old foes will sell tickets, and that's what you want.
 
You don’t really believe that do you? I don’t think people in that area are just going to start watching Wyoming vs San Jose games now.

They serve a purpose of getting a central time zone team for tv lineups. An 8pm ET game can be slotted into network programming now, without effecting the local team too much. Will fans actually watch? Different story.
I think it makes a difference to an extent. I mean it's a better TV market than most of the CUSA markets. To me the biggest thing they bring as far as their area is the recruiting hot bed that they're in.
 
FWIW, I spent some time on the UNLV board tonight and their fans are warm to us joining the MWC. Not excited, but receptive. And I agree with one suggestion I read on their board that the MWC go all-in -- generally speaking -- in Texas and bring in UTEP, Texas State, and Sam Houston and really box out the PAC12. I kinda like that idea.
It might not be popular here, but add NMSU, and then you have two "travel" partners for the non-football sports. Adding the 3 Texas schools may be even better for the MWC; you block the Pac from Texas.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TxRdKiller
But that’s two different things. They didn’t merge because of anything UTEP related. They didn’t merge because they would be dissolving one conference and losing auto bids in all conference sports.
Yeah but it was rumored that UTEP was invited around that time and turned it down.
 
Be honest, the La Tech rivalry was good for UTEP. WKU strengthened UTEP's schedule almost every year as did Liberty and MTSU basketball games were good many years.

However, those MW old foes will sell tickets, and that's what you want.
It will be nice to not play in the high school gyms that most cusa teams play in and against schools that have actual fans. Excited to revive the Nevada rivalry as well as UNM and the old WAC foes.
 
I’ve got no problem at all. I know UTEP doesn’t travel well BUT Albuquerque, and Las Vegas are short trips. Costs aside, no one’s going to complain about traveling to Hawaii.
Who says they don’t travel well? To your examples, I’ve been to UTEP football games in both Albuquerque and Las Vegas and every time sat with a ton of UTEP fans.
 
  • Like
Reactions: T-6 Miner
I wonder if we were the first choice then Texas St? Or did Texas St turn them down and we were the second choice? Were we invited together? If Texas St doesn't join, do they add NMSU? Do they add NMSU regardless?

I can't imagine UTEP taking a long time for the decision. I think that we will accept the invitation at some point tomorrow or Wednesday at the latest unless we blow it somehow.
 
If this happens, how much is the buyout? I remember it was a 5 year GOR, but was it $900k per year before 2027 or different amount/year?
 
If this happens, how much is the buyout? I remember it was a 5 year GOR, but was it $900k per year before 2027 or different amount/year?

I think I read 2 million somewhere, also have read 800k in 2 payments

One note: the Hawaii exemption allows teams to play a 13th game, an extra home game when you travel to the island to offset travel cost
 
There's something funky about the leaks. Normally you keep things quiet until the deal is done. Leaking happens when you're trying to provoke a reaction. Did it come from UTEP or MWC? I think the Tx St leak came from MWC.

Possibilities:
1. Sometimes a leak is just a leak.
2. MWC leaks both TX St and UTEP in the hopes of causing each other to panic that they'll be left out and sign now and not hold out for PAC.
3. UTEP leaks the story to try to goose PAC into making a move -- idea being that PAC would see the possibility that they get frozen out of Texas and offer one or both.
4. some scheme either too devious or too stupid for me to think about it right now
 
There's something funky about the leaks. Normally you keep things quiet until the deal is done. Leaking happens when you're trying to provoke a reaction. Did it come from UTEP or MWC? I think the Tx St leak came from MWC.

Possibilities:
1. Sometimes a leak is just a leak.
2. MWC leaks both TX St and UTEP in the hopes of causing each other to panic that they'll be left out and sign now and not hold out for PAC.
3. UTEP leaks the story to try to goose PAC into making a move -- idea being that PAC would see the possibility that they get frozen out of Texas and offer one or both.
4. some scheme either too devious or too stupid for me to think about it right now
Isn't this the same way it happened for Utah St and the Pac 12?
 
It might not be popular here, but add NMSU, and then you have two "travel" partners for the non-football sports. Adding the 3 Texas schools may be even better for the MWC; you block the Pac from Texas.
F nmsu. This is a business. We must look out for ourselves. We need that OOC game. They are perfect. Helps with scheduling bball too. So NO to nmsu.
 
There's something funky about the leaks. Normally you keep things quiet until the deal is done. Leaking happens when you're trying to provoke a reaction. Did it come from UTEP or MWC? I think the Tx St leak came from MWC.

Possibilities:
1. Sometimes a leak is just a leak.
2. MWC leaks both TX St and UTEP in the hopes of causing each other to panic that they'll be left out and sign now and not hold out for PAC.
3. UTEP leaks the story to try to goose PAC into making a move -- idea being that PAC would see the possibility that they get frozen out of Texas and offer one or both.
4. some scheme either too devious or too stupid for me to think about it right now
Good point, that or the PAC told UTEP, we are not offering, like they did to Hawaii
 
  • Like
Reactions: FarWestTexas
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT