Fake News. And now this. Bowlsby wasting no time in going after pac remnants.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Obvious fake accountAnd now this. Bowlsby wasting no time in going after pac remnants.
They got me. Still could happen.Obvious fake account
Under this scenario I could see Colorado St and Air Force going to the AAC.We've all wanted to be in the MWC forever, but here's what it might look like after the chips fall. Not very impressive if you ask me. Not that we're in a great situation now though. I think at best it'd be a marginal step up, but at least we'd have old rivalries and it'd make better geographical sense.
Boise St, SDSU, UNLV, Fresno St. probably leaving to make a new watered down Pac 10 with Washington St Oregon st and whoever gets left behind. That would leave
San Jose St. , Nevada, Wyoming, (CSU if they don't go Pac 10 or Big 12) UNM, Air Force, (Hawaii Football) and I guess add UTEP, NMSU and maybe La Tech?
So what options do the MWC leftovers have if the MWC is raided by the PAC12 and AAC? Might they be forced to join CUSA?Under this scenario I could see Colorado St and Air Force going to the AAC.
Very True, which would make MWC take more from the CUSA or FCS to fill up the rest. So if that happens it'd be an even more watered down MWC that Utep would finally have a shot to be in, Meh 😏Under this scenario I could see Colorado St and Air Force going to the AAC.
Exactly 💯 Honestly still don't understand how Rutgers is still in the Power 5 and about to be the Power 1, but whatever. This is just ridiculous and needs to be stopped somehow or it's just gonna just be two conferences in the playoffs every year and tor Conferences I'm the final 4 and I for one am not down for that BS!UCLA in the same conference as Buttgers.
This is lunacy.
That would be a dream scenario. CUSA has the spots to take them in.So what options do the MWC leftovers have if the MWC is raided by the PAC12 and AAC? Might they be forced to join CUSA?
For those that are “upset” about this, you need to understand why. It’s money and it’s always money. Rutgers was added to the Big 10 because of money. They added a big media market and put the B10 Network on some of the biggest cable providers in the world. They suck at football, but it doesn’t matter because they make the Big 10 money. They also provide “access” to NJ area recruits and students.
Adding UCLA and USC will increase all Big 10 schools money big time. So whatever they’re paying extra in flights, they’re making a lot more via media deals.
Why is there no outrage from UTEP fans about traveling to West Virginia and Florida since we joined CUSA? Is there that much difference between flying to those destinations than LA to Big 10 schools? Nope. Only difference is Big 10 is making 1000x whatever CUSA “makes”. Flights to NJ would kill UTEP, but it’s pocket change to UCLA and USC.
Right now, PAC and Big 12 are looking to poach from each other. Which is the stronger conference right now without USC, UCLA and Oklahoma, Texas? If you're Stanford, Arizona or ASU, where would you rather be?
Super conference is aligning. Changes within the next five years to let D1 (FBS) and their respective state governments that have jurisdictional control sort their finances and budgets, maybe? SEC, B10, ACC and PAC 12 super conference is forming (Big XII out side looking in, possibly?). I really do think the NCAA will ease into this so as too not have angry mob situations, especially for alumni in state governments sitting on state governmental appropriation committee's who threaten with power of the purse if their beloved school is left out.We've all wanted to be in the MWC forever, but here's what it might look like after the chips fall. Not very impressive if you ask me. Not that we're in a great situation now though. I think at best it'd be a marginal step up, but at least we'd have old rivalries and it'd make better geographical sense.
Boise St, SDSU, UNLV, Fresno St. probably leaving to make a new watered down Pac 10 with Washington St Oregon st and whoever gets left behind. That would leave
San Jose St. , Nevada, Wyoming, (CSU if they don't go Pac 10 or Big 12) UNM, Air Force, (Hawaii Football) and I guess add UTEP, NMSU and maybe La Tech?
Huge if ND joins a conference. Never wanted to share that football tv $$$
UTEP admin is gonna take the wait and see approach. They are useless and don't gave the financial support anyway.
I think the NCAA will likely no longer be involved on college football within a few years.
If the schools are still offering scholarships for football, even if the governing body is no longer the NCAA, they'll still have to balance those with scholarship opportunities for women. Title IX is a Federal law, not an NCAA law.I wonder how that would affect Title IX. Without football, it would create problems.
Just wait, the Christofascists on the Supreme Court will rule it unconstitutional.If the schools are still offering scholarships for football, even if the governing body is no longer the NCAA, they'll still have to balance those with scholarship opportunities for women. Title IX is a Federal law, not an NCAA law.
If the "Christofascists" were activist judges like the liberal judges, they would have fabricated some pretense (like an "emanation" from a "penumbra") to ban abortion. But that's not what they did. They looked at the text of the Constitution, saw that it was silent on the issue (either pro- or against), so they sent it back to the states where the people of the states will elect representatives to their legislatures (the branch of government that, as we are taught in elementary civics, is responsible for making laws) who will set abortion policy consistent with the prevailing values of the people of their state.Just wait, the Christofascists on the Supreme Court will rule it unconstitutional.
I respect your opinion Axing, but what is UTEP supposed to do?UTEP admin is gonna take the wait and see approach. They are useless and don't gave the financial support anyway.
I think the NCAA will likely no longer be involved in college football within a few years.
This map feels like someone went crazy with the NCAA footbal video game.
Is abortion banned in 13 states now? Yes? No?If the "Christofascists" were activist judges like the liberal judges, they would have fabricated some pretense (like an "emanation" from a "penumbra") to ban abortion. But that's not what they did. They looked at the text of the Constitution, saw that it was silent on the issue (either pro- or against), so they sent it back to the states where the people of the states will elect representatives to their legislatures (the branch of government that, as we are taught in elementary civics, is responsible for making laws) who will set abortion policy consistent with the prevailing values of the people of their state.
Similarly with the EPA ruling, the EPA being an agency of the executive branch, which (as we learn in elementary civics) is not the branch of government responsible for making laws, the EPA is only empowered to set policy as delegated by laws that have been passed by Congress (the legislative branch which, as we are taught in elementary civics, is the branch of government responsible for making laws). The Supreme Court looked at the text of the relevant laws, and did not see where Congress had delegated powers to the EPA that the EPA was trying to assume for itself.
There is a good-faith, consistent philosophy at work.
Each state decides for itself. If it is banned in 13 states, then I guess it's not banned in 37 states, if the math works out.Is abortion banned in 13 states now? Yes? No?
So those women in those 13 states have fewer healthcare rights than in the other 37. Is that right? Fair? Just? Slavery of a different kind.Each state decides for itself. If it is banned in 13 states, then I guess it's not banned in 37 states, if the math works out.
Isn't half of the voting populace in those states comprised of women? They are enfranchised to change the law in their state if they so choose. They can do this because of the 19th Amendment, which guarantees their right to vote, so they have equal say in electing their government.So those women in those 13 states have fewer healthcare rights than in the other 37. Is that right? Fair? Just? Slavery of a different kind.
Now do the CUSA one
Try the 14th amendment on for size you self-righteous prick.Isn't half of the voting populace in those states comprised of women? They are enfranchised to change the law in their state if they so choose. They can do this because of the 19th Amendment, which guarantees their right to vote, so they have equal say in electing their government.
I can't find which amendment guarantees the right to abortion. When exactly did it happen?
Wow, name-calling.Try the 14th amendment on for size you self-righteous prick.
The constitution doesn't say a lot of shit we have to do every day you POS.Wow, name-calling.
Sorry, I don't see abortion mentioned in the 14th Amendment. I do, however, see the word life.
Okay.The constitution doesn't say a lot of shit we have to do every day you POS.
Develman, don't let these anti-American cultists get to you. Yeah, they think they're winning but there's a train coming...The constitution doesn't say a lot of shit we have to do every day you POS.