Good comparison. Exactly what came to my mind as well.Two different things. This is the same argument that is held on here every once in a while - Nord v Price. Price won with Nord players blah, blah, blah.
Maybe Dimel would have been successful in that 4th year, he wasn’t, Briles was. I bet Coug fans remember him for the 0-11 season and not for “turning things around” like 2Step wrongly claims.
You’re right, for the most part, that UH fans remember Dimel for his lack of success. There a minority of Coog fans that do think Dimel stocked the cupboard and perhaps would have turned things around given another year. Who knows?
We are Coog fans as opposed to Coug fans, tho.