ADVERTISEMENT

UTEP Men’s NCAA Tourney Appearances

centex-miner

MI VIP
Jun 28, 2001
1,888
247
63
I must admit I never thought UTEP’s Men’s Basketball would be this irrelevant. We are heading back to a time similar to before the Don Haskins era. This plus the new environment in college sports has really made me somewhat apathetic towards the men’s UTEP FB and BB programs. Something needs to change to bring back my excitement. Not sure what that is; however, I know the status quo is not working.

——

Between 1963 and 1992 - 14 appearances (in the Tourney almost 50% of the time)

Between 1993 and 2022 - 3 appearances (10%)

13 years since last appearance


YearRoundOpponentResult
1963First roundTexasL 47–65
1964First round
Sweet Sixteen
Regional third-place game
Texas A&M
Kansas State
Creighton
W 68–62
L 60–64
W 63–52
1966First round
Sweet Sixteen
Elite Eight
Final Four
Championship Game
Oklahoma City
Cincinnati
Kansas
Utah
Kentucky
W 89–74
W 78–76
W 81–80
W 85–78
W 72–65
1967First round
Sweet Sixteen
Regional third-place game
Seattle
Pacific
Wyoming
W 62–54
L 63–72
W 69–67
1970First roundUtah StateL 81–91
1975First roundIndianaL 53–78
1984*Second roundUNLVL 60–73
1985First round
Second round
Tulsa
NC State
W 79–75
L 73–86
1986First roundBradleyL 65–83
1987First round
Second round
Arizona
Iowa
W 98–91 OT
L 82–84
1988First roundSeton HallL 64–80
1989First round
Second round
LSU
Indiana
W 85–74
L 69–92
1990First roundMinnesotaL 61–64 OT
1992First round
Second round
Sweet Sixteen
Evansville
Kansas
Cincinnati
W 55–50
W 66–60
L 67–69
2004First roundMarylandL 83–86
2005First roundUtahL 54–60
2010First roundButlerL 59–77
 
Last edited:
I must admit I never thought UTEP’s Men’s Basketball would be this irrelevant. We are heading back to a time similar to before the Don Haskins era. This plus the new environment in college sports has really made me somewhat apathetic towards the men’s UTEP FB and BB programs. Something needs to change to bring back my excitement. Not sure what that is; however, I know the status quo is not working.

——

Between 1963 and 1992 - 14 appearances (in the Tourney almost 50% of the time)

Between 1993 and 2022 - 3 appearances (10%)

13 years since last appearance


YearRoundOpponentResult
1963First roundTexasL 47–65
1964First round
Sweet Sixteen
Regional third-place game
Texas A&M
Kansas State
Creighton
W 68–62
L 60–64
W 63–52
1966First round
Sweet Sixteen
Elite Eight
Final Four
Championship Game
Oklahoma City
Cincinnati
Kansas
Utah
Kentucky
W 89–74
W 78–76
W 81–80
W 85–78
W 72–65
1967First round
Sweet Sixteen
Regional third-place game
Seattle
Pacific
Wyoming
W 62–54
L 63–72
W 69–67
1970First roundUtah StateL 81–91
1975First roundIndianaL 53–78
1984*Second roundUNLVL 60–73
1985First round
Second round
Tulsa
NC State
W 79–75
L 73–86
1986First roundBradleyL 65–83
1987First round
Second round
Arizona
Iowa
W 98–91 OT
L 82–84
1988First roundSeton HallL 64–80
1989First round
Second round
LSU
Indiana
W 85–74
L 69–92
1990First roundMinnesotaL 61–64 OT
1992First round
Second round
Sweet Sixteen
Evansville
Kansas
Cincinnati
W 55–50
W 66–60
L 67–69
2004First roundMarylandL 83–86
2005First roundUtahL 54–60
2010First roundButlerL 59–77
The one percenters of college athletes ruined college athletics for the remaining 99% and its fans with the transfer portal and NILs.
 
It’s been 31 years since we won an NCAA Tournament game. That 1992 team was only 26 years removed from the 1966 title team. The whole athletic department as a whole, across all major men’s sports has fallen off so hard that I don’t think we can ever recover from where we’re at.
 
Last edited:
I must admit I never thought UTEP’s Men’s Basketball would be this irrelevant. We are heading back to a time similar to before the Don Haskins era. This plus the new environment in college sports has really made me somewhat apathetic towards the men’s UTEP FB and BB programs. Something needs to change to bring back my excitement. Not sure what that is; however, I know the status quo is not working.

——

Between 1963 and 1992 - 14 appearances (in the Tourney almost 50% of the time)

Between 1993 and 2022 - 3 appearances (10%)

13 years since last appearance


YearRoundOpponentResult
1963First roundTexasL 47–65
1964First round
Sweet Sixteen
Regional third-place game
Texas A&M
Kansas State
Creighton
W 68–62
L 60–64
W 63–52
1966First round
Sweet Sixteen
Elite Eight
Final Four
Championship Game
Oklahoma City
Cincinnati
Kansas
Utah
Kentucky
W 89–74
W 78–76
W 81–80
W 85–78
W 72–65
1967First round
Sweet Sixteen
Regional third-place game
Seattle
Pacific
Wyoming
W 62–54
L 63–72
W 69–67
1970First roundUtah StateL 81–91
1975First roundIndianaL 53–78
1984*Second roundUNLVL 60–73
1985First round
Second round
Tulsa
NC State
W 79–75
L 73–86
1986First roundBradleyL 65–83
1987First round
Second round
Arizona
Iowa
W 98–91 OT
L 82–84
1988First roundSeton HallL 64–80
1989First round
Second round
LSU
Indiana
W 85–74
L 69–92
1990First roundMinnesotaL 61–64 OT
1992First round
Second round
Sweet Sixteen
Evansville
Kansas
Cincinnati
W 55–50
W 66–60
L 67–69
2004First roundMarylandL 83–86
2005First roundUtahL 54–60
2010First roundButlerL 59–77
I had forgotten how badly things had gotten in Haskins later years as coach
 
It’s been 30 years since we won an NCAA Tournament game. That 1992 team was only 26 years removed from the 1966 title team. The whole athletic department as a whole, across all major men’s sports has fallen off so hard that I don’t think we can ever recover from where we’re at.
The athletic department has always been a disaster and could care less about results. UTEP just lucked out to have a hall of fame coach that decided to spend his career at UTEP. If we didn’t have Haskins, the basketball program would have been irrelevant like it is now with a good season every now and then.
 
It was bad. He couldn’t recruit. Sound familiar?

Besides 2 losing years, it wasn't bad. Plus, they were playing against better teams.


1992–93 UTEP 21–13 10–8 4th NIT Second Round
1993–94 UTEP 18–12 8–10 T–5th
1994–95 UTEP 20–10 13–5 T–2nd NIT Second Round
1995–96 UTEP 13–15 4–14 9th
1996–97 UTEP 13–13 6–10 T–6th (Mountain)
1997–98 UTEP 12–14 3–11 7th (Mountain)
1998–99 UTEP 16–12 8–6 4th (Pacific)
 
  • Like
Reactions: PickMyAxe915
Besides 2 losing years, it wasn't bad. Plus, they were playing against better teams.


1992–93 UTEP 21–13 10–8 4th NIT Second Round
1993–94 UTEP 18–12 8–10 T–5th
1994–95 UTEP 20–10 13–5 T–2nd NIT Second Round
1995–96 UTEP 13–15 4–14 9th
1996–97 UTEP 13–13 6–10 T–6th (Mountain)
1997–98 UTEP 12–14 3–11 7th (Mountain)
1998–99 UTEP 16–12 8–6 4th (Pacific)
I was talking about his last 4 years. Obviously, making the NIT is a good season. The teams weren’t better than previous. The WAC had added Rice, SMU, TCU, and San Jose St. All were horrible at basketball. Only UNLV and Tulsa had respectable teams at the time.
 
I was talking about his last 4 years. Obviously, making the NIT is a good season. The teams weren’t better than previous. The WAC had added Rice, SMU, TCU, and San Jose St. All were horrible at basketball. Only UNLV and Tulsa had respectable teams at the time.

Finishing in 4th place isn't bad.

In Haskin's last season Rice was 18-10 and TCU was 22-11. They
weren't horrible. UTEP still had to play UNLV, Utah, UNM, etc.
 
Besides 2 losing years, it wasn't bad. Plus, they were playing against better teams.


1992–93 UTEP 21–13 10–8 4th NIT Second Round
1993–94 UTEP 18–12 8–10 T–5th
1994–95 UTEP 20–10 13–5 T–2nd NIT Second Round
1995–96 UTEP 13–15 4–14 9th
1996–97 UTEP 13–13 6–10 T–6th (Mountain)
1997–98 UTEP 12–14 3–11 7th (Mountain)
1998–99 UTEP 16–12 8–6 4th (Pacific)
Those records look terrible. What do you mean it wasn’t all that bad? 13-13. 12-14. 13-15. Even 16-12. That’s not bad?
 
The WAC was getting multiple teams before they expanded. They got 3 bids in 1993. Then 2 each of the next 3 years (94,95,96). The 3 years they played with 16, they only got 3,4, and 3.

Adding 6 teams didn’t really add much, except splitting the pie into smaller pieces and greater travel expenses.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinerFan79
The WAC was getting multiple teams before they expanded. They got 3 bids in 1993. Then 2 each of the next 3 years (94,95,96). The 3 years they played with 16, they only got 3,4, and 3.

Adding 6 teams didn’t really add much, except splitting the pie into smaller pieces and greater travel expenses.

But yet you said Tulsa and UNLV were the only respectable teams back then. 😂
 
But yet you said Tulsa and UNLV were the only respectable teams back then. 😂
Out of the ones that were added. TCU hadn’t been to the dance since 1987. SMU hadn’t been since 1988. Rice and San Jose still haven’t gone since they joined the WAC. All 4 of them were sucky programs. UTEP was better than all 4 of them. By a wide margin!
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinerFan79
Out of the ones that were added. TCU hadn’t been to the dance since 1987. SMU hadn’t been since 1988. Rice and San Jose still haven’t gone since they joined the WAC. All 4 of them were sucky programs. UTEP was better than all 4 of them. By a wide margin!

lol Now you are backtracking. We were talking about the WAC as a whole league.
 
Nobody said it was phenomenal. It just wasn't terrible, considering how tough the WAC was back then.
Look you said something really stupid and I called you on it. You claimed the last 4years(plural) weren’t bad. I cited the awful records from your list and all you do was claim 16-12 wasn’t bad ignoring the other years records. If Golding ends up with that same record over a 4 year stretch he will be fired. Any coach would.
 
Look you said something really stupid and I called you on it. You claimed the last 4years(plural) weren’t bad. I cited the awful records from your list and all you do was claim 16-12 wasn’t bad ignoring the other years records. If Golding ends up with that same record over a 4 year stretch he will be fired. Any coach would.


This is what I stated: "Besides 2 losing years, it wasn't bad. Plus, they were playing against better teams."
 
Getting two teams into a field of 64 is the definition of “very high quality” meanwhile EPUTEP is claiming a 16-12 season with no post season play, not even NIT, was great

Now you're putting words into my mouth. Where did I say 16-12 was a great season?
 
lol Now you are backtracking. We were talking about the WAC as a whole league.
No. You said the Miners were playing against better teams then. I then said out of the 6 teams they added, only 2 were good. So they weren’t playing against better teams. SMU, TCU, Rice, and SJSU were all beneath UTEP basketball when they joined the WAC. It doesn’t matter if you picked out 1 year one or two of them faired a bit better than their normal records.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinerFan79
No. You said the Miners were playing against better teams then. I then said out of the 6 teams they added, only 2 were good. So they weren’t playing against better teams. SMU, TCU, Rice, and SJSU were all beneath UTEP basketball when they joined the WAC. It doesn’t matter if you picked out 1 year one or two of them faired a bit better than their normal records.

Yes, there were playing against better teams back then. Utah went to the National Championship game. Other teams were ranked. It's apples and oranges comparing the old WAC to the current CUSA teams. Going 16-12 in the old WAC wasn't terrible.

You also said "The WAC had added Rice, SMU, TCU, and San Jose St. All were horrible at basketball."

That above statement is false. In Haskins' last season Rice was 18-10 and TCU was 22-11.
 
  • Like
Reactions: MinerFan79
Wasn’t the WAC getting multiple NCAA Tournament bids at that time? The quality of basketball was very high at that time.
A good comparison for the WAC of old would be the MWC of today. During the mid 80s into the 90s the WAC was getting 3 teams into the tourney on a fairly regular basis. The quality of basketball was usually pretty good through the top 5-6 teams in the conference.
 
ADVERTISEMENT

Latest posts

ADVERTISEMENT