You’re missing the part where we fire him after a few bad years instead of letting it go on for seven years.Yes we have been over this. The point you're missing is that he was a proven winner who was unable to produce a winning season after the first two years. History shows us that hiring another proven winner will most like net the same result of failure in the end.
If we had fired MP after year 6 this job would have attracted many qualified coaches that could continue what he started. We were still getting over 30k and were on the cusp of going from mediocre to conference contenders.